- Regency Gowns: Who Would be a Seamstress?
- Regency evening gowns: delicious detail at bosom and ankle
- Regency gowns: clean, alter, mend the damage
- Historical Costume 1780s : Polonaise Gown
- Historical Costume 1780s : Caraco. But what IS a caraco?
- Historical Costume 1800-1820 : the simple Regency gown?
- Historical Costume 1800-1820: a spencer for a skimpy gown?
- Historical Costume 1800-1820: Keeping Warm in a Pelisse
- Historical Costume 1800-1820 : Parasols Up and Down
- Designer Stubble: the Bane of Regency Book Covers
- Historical Costume, 1790-1830 : Shoes, slippers
- Historical Costume 1800-1820: boots and bags
- An improper blog : embroidery and the pains of fashion
- Historical Costume : 1800-1831 Royal Jewellery to bling it up
- Historical Costume 1800-1850 : the Lady’s Riding Habit
- A Close Shave (or the gentle art of Pogonomotomy)
- Historical costume pics: gowns, petticoats, dolls, even men
Polonaise not Panniers!
This blog looks at the lovely Georgian polonaise gown, as a follow-up to my earlier blogs about the hard work of the seamstress and the lady’s maid. We marvel at these gowns in museums — and most of us know that every stitch was hand-sewn — but do we stop to think about the detail of the process?
Shown left is a modern replica of a 1780 polonaise gown, made in plain white fabric to show off the detail of construction. Shown right is an original gown dating from the late 1780s and with the back only partly lifted.
Normally, the back of the polonaise would be lifted in two or more places to show the petticoat beneath, as shown below.
Isn’t the polonaise style elegant? So much more appealing than those huge side panniers that made a woman much too wide to go through a normal door without turning sideways on.
If you enlarge the V&A picture you can see the gorgeous detail of the ruches on the skirt back.
And below are 3 images of a French polonaise from the V&A, showing the back (with 2 dark buttons at the waist for attaching loops), the front (which would have had a “false front” to fill the gap), and the back looped up in two places onto those silk-covered buttons. I admit to preferring the looped version.
1780 French polonaise gown showing effect of looped skirts © Victoria and Albert Museum, London
How to discover the seamstress’s secrets? Make it yourself!
I was lucky enough to visit the Hereford Museum’s Exhibition: Shades of White: the changing shape of women a couple of years ago and to meet its creator, Professor Nancy Hills, Head of Theatre Costume Design, Caine College, Utah State University. She led the project which recreated real costumes from the Hereford Museum and Berrington Hall (Wade) collections (with the assistance of their costume curator, Althea Mackenzie).
All the exhibition’s replicas were made in shades of white so that the intricacies of cut and construction could be seen; the workmanship was fantastic and a visitor could get up close and personal with the garments. (Professor Hills has also done a fascinating TEDx talk on Make Do and Mend about fashion in times of war. Worth a listen and it includes some really interesting illustrations and little-known facts about topics like WWII rationing.)
Sewing a polonaise
So… if you’re going to sew a polonaise, what do you need? Try this pattern for size…
Only 5 shapes, so it wouldn’t be too difficult, you’d think? I’d have thought so too, until I realised that the bodice sections had to be stiffened with a linen lining and there were nine darts to be sewn on each sleeve. Also, that long skinny piece at the centre back looks exceedingly difficult to sew, to my amateur eyes. Then I looked underneath the skirt and saw all that detailed pleating where the skirt joined the back of the bodice. A seamstress’s nightmare?
This view from underneath also shows how the ties work to achieve the ruched back of the overskirt. Really very simple and very clever. The tie on the 1780 original polonaise on which the replica was based, shown below, looks much the same.
And here’s the detail of the neckline at the back of the bodice of the original 1780 gown. Just look at all those seams, so intricately and beautifully stitched together. If you look closely, you’ll see that that difficult centre piece was not cut on the double, but as two single pieces that were then stitched together. Double seamstressly nightmare?***
Nancy Bradfield’s incredibly useful book, Costume in Detail, 1730-1930, includes detailed drawings of this very polonaise gown from 1780 (pp 65-66). She notes that the (double) tape ties for the ruches are underneath, 12 inches up from the hem; and there are two sets of loops underneath: 2.5 inches and 14 inches below the waist.
I would add that the waist measurement was not the vaunted 16 inches, but a slightly more reassuring 24 😉
Wearing a polonaise
The polonaise is a very clever style. The elegant ruches are achieved by simple ties underneath and the height can be adjusted to suit the occasion. If you have a particularly beautiful petticoat — perhaps an embroidered one — you can pull the ruches high to show it off. Sometimes the ruches are achieved by attaching loops from underneath to buttons on the outside (as in the V&A French example above).
But what about the front? How is it fastened? They didn’t have zips or velcro in those days. They did have buttons but there is no sign that buttons were used on the front of the original polonaise gowns that I’ve seen in museums. It seems that the front was usually fastened with nothing more than pins.
Front view of original 1787 polonaise showing green quilted petticoat
The bodice front (shown unfastened here) appears to have been held together with pins
Bradfield says that the1780 gown would “probably have been worn over a muslin petticoat”. She also notes that the signs of wear on the bodice suggest that it was just pinned together.
With ordinary pins.
Yes, you would need to be wearing a sturdy corset because, if you breathed out too much, you’d stab yourself on your own pins.
The 19th century polonaise
The polonaise had legs, as they say. It appeared again, a century or so later, in various guises such as those shown below.
1870 polonaise-style gown
Lots of polonaise gowns on the cover of sheet music in 1872
1883 gown, captioned “Misses’ Polonaise Costume” but perhaps not very flattering?
Why a polonaise for the historical costume blog? Why not Regency?
I love the polonaise style, partly because it’s so elegant, partly because my Regency-era heroine wore one at the masked ball in His Cavalry Lady. I based it on the 1780 gown shown as a white replica in the pictures above.
Why choose a polonaise? Well, my heroine was serving as a cavalry officer in the Russian army during the Napoleonic Wars — yes, I know some readers doubt such a disguise was possible, but i assure you it was; my heroine was based on a Russian woman (Nadezhda Durova) who served and fought in the Russian cavalry for ten years without being discovered. We tend to forget that, in those days, soldiers didn’t bathe or change their clothes nearly as often as we do!
My heroine had to find a gown from a previous era that she could put on without assistance since she needed to maintain her male guise. The polonaise overdress, worn over a front-lacing corset and a drawstring petticoat, could be put on like a coat.
Ideal for a woman masquerading as a man masquerading as a woman, no?
PS I’m planning more of these blogs about the detail of historical costume and how particular styles were created and worn. Next up — the caraco.
What’s a caraco?
Find out in the next blog in this Historical Costume series, coming soon.
*** Late news: I wasn’t able to say how long the poor seamstress would take to create a polonaise by hand but a recent blog from Two Nerdy History Girls has done just that. And the answer? For a much simpler version of the polonaise, the answer was just over 10 hours of solid sewing by a skilled mantua-maker. That blog also provides useful information about how mantua-makers worked and how gowns were priced to the customer.