Writers of historicals are always on the lookout for anachronisms. They still trip us up, time and again. But the real elephant traps are the unknown unknowns [© D Rumsfeld?], the things we don’t know we don’t know—and, as a result, we don’t know we’re getting wrong.
I was prompted to write this blog by some of the reactions to my post about habit words, a couple of weeks ago.
Anachronisms? The standard definition is something out of its time—an object, an expression, an attitude—something that does not belong in the period of the story.
We wouldn’t put electric light in a Regency setting, for example. That one is easy to spot. But how am I, as a historical writer, supposed to spot the ones that lurk in the undergrowth of my ignorance?
I’m going to tell you a story.
Are you sitting comfortably?
Then I’ll begin.
Jane’s Story : background
Our heroine, Jane Austing, is returning from Brazil following the death of her widowed father, Sir Comfrey Austing, who had been a diplomat in South America for several years. Jane is accompanied by her faithful maid, Betty Coldsore, a woman of middle age and comfortable proportions.
Jane is en route to Fastbuck Abbey, Sir Comfrey’s family seat in Surrey. Sir Comfrey’s baronetcy (and entailed property) has passed to his nephew, Jolyon Fartheringale Fastbuck Austing. But the new baronet is unlikely to welcome her presence for long, because he hates her. Jane, in turn, detests Jolyon—her only living relative—because he picked on her when they were children. Jane’s situation is dire, as there was precious little unentailed wealth for her to inherit. If Jane can’t find a husband to provide for her, she may have to face the appalling prospect of becoming a governess or a lady’s companion.
[You may find this story somewhat formulaic, but stick with it, the anachronisms are about to heave over the horizon, obscured only by clouds of clichés…]
Opening : our heroine arrives at Fastbuck Abbey…
They were speeding up again. But nothing was the same as before. On the relatively even surface of the metalled turnpike road, the motion of the wheels had been regular, even soothing. Here the chaise was wobbling and lurching, as first the left wheel, then the right, dropped into deep splashy ruts.
…and finds…
Jane let down the glass, slowly and carefully so as not to wake Betty, and stuck her head out to get her first sight of her ancestral home for nearly five years.
From here, there should have been a fine vista of the house, along a drive flanked by stately limes, but the understorey of rhododendrons had been allowed to grow without restraint. She hated their gloomy humps, now more than ever. Their dreary outgrowths were encroaching onto the drive. No doubt their leathery leaves helped to drip extra water into those unfilled ruts.
…horror upon horror in the grounds…
Betty woke up then, of course, but Jane refused to allow the abigail to climb down. Jane wanted this moment for herself. In contemplative silence.
She smiled at the memory. She had climbed it, of course. It had been worth it, in spite of the whipping she had received for her disobedience. Under its spreading branches, she had played cricket against Jolyon. And bowled him out, middle stump. Now she could see that some of the cedar’s lower branches had been lopped off. Was that Jolyon’s revenge for having been beaten by a mere girl? Future young Austings would be hard-pressed to gain a foothold, though nothing could daunt the squirrels. There were two of them, chasing each other along a branch, running straight as lethal leaden bullets. Were they fighting? Or perhaps—decidedly improper thought—flirting? It was spring, after all.
With a deep sigh, she climbed back up to her seat and bade the coachman drive on. Betty began a running commentary on all the dreadful neglect of the park, but Jane closed her ears to it. She would live in blissful memories inside her own head, until the moment reality was forced upon her, as she crossed the threshold of Fastbuck Abbey.
…and in the house…
But Betty was before her, bustling forward to shake a fist in the butler’s face. “What kind of welcome is this, Wallflower? Are you become too fine to recognise us?”
Wallflower’s jaw dropped. Clearly he had failed to recognise Jane, but Betty had not changed a whit in five years, except to grow rounder. “Why it is Miss Coldsore. And…and Miss Jane, of course. Excuse me, I did not recognise you, miss. Pray do come in.” He pulled the door back to allow them to enter.
Jane knew she had been no beauty when she left. Five years in tropical heat had not improved her looks. But as she strolled through the hall, all that fell away. Happy memories flooded back and she was swimming through them, in slow motion, as in a hypnotic dream. Betty’s gabbling to Wallflower was merely background noise, an impenetrable robotic buzz.
…there is worse to come…
Her trance ended abruptly when she was installed in the blue saloon, to await the arrival of the master of the house. The room had been changed a great deal. It was grander than before, filled with gilded ornaments and furniture that even the Prince of Wales might have envied. Was Jolyon’s ego so massive now that it required such a backdrop? Was this how all Jane’s father’s substance was to be squandered? So that a nasty, jumped-up wastrel could have his moment in the limelight?
Jane resolved not to stay a day longer at the Abbey than she had to.
To Jane’s surprise, Jolyon strode into the room with a beaming smile on his face. “Why, Jane, how good to see you after all these years. You must be starving after all those hours cooped up on the road. There will be freshly roasted grouse for dinner. Shot it m’self. But, in the meantime, honey, can I fix you something? A whisky and soda? A sandwich?”
[NOT to be continued]
Let us draw a veil over the proceedings at that point…
You’ve probably fallen over the anachronisms in poor Jane’s story. I’ll admit that there are a fair few. And the author can’t cope with writing any more of this drivel.
Argh!
How many anachronisms in Mary’s single eight-word sentence?
I count a possible six. (1) honey, 20th century American English; (2) fix, ditto; (3) sandwich, 18th century (4) can, which should be may in speech of the period; (5) Bothwell which should probably have been James, since Bothwell was the formal mode of address and they were lovers; (6) the whole idea that an anointed queen of the 16th century would do anything as menial as preparing food. How many do you see?
And other bloomers in Jane’s story? I’m not going to quote any more here (though bloomer would be one). I wrote the Austing story, but that doesn’t mean I’ve seen them all. Unknown unknowns, remember? However, if you want to know about the anachronisms that I introduced deliberately, I’ll be producing a newsletter in midweek, with my complete list. If you’d like a copy, sign up for our newsletter at the top of the sidebar or click here.
PS The proper names in the story aren’t anachronisms. They’re just the author’s flights of fancy, to get her through the process of creating this claptrap.
Weeping with laughter down here in Australia! Thank you. I’ve picked up a fair few. In fact I was tripping over them. Definitely looking forward to seeing the complete list.
Laughing here at the mental picture of you laughing, Elizabeth. Am just about to start drafting the newsletter with my answer list. It may be…er…a bit loooooong 😉
I have to tell you that when I was procrastinating on Friday I came across your post on “crutch” words. Since the Australian conference went virtual this weekend I’ve spent the afternoon giving an online workshop on working with editors and editing generally. You got a mention. I reworked a couple slides to include a reference to the post and your list. Thank you for that!
Thanks for the mention, Elizabeth. Now I understand the number of hits on that post from down under. I was wondering… Glad it was useful for your online workshop.
Really? Good lord! I only finished presenting about half an hour ago.
Oops. Hope they weren’t reading my blog instead of listening to your words of wisdom 😉
Chuckling in Sussex, too, Joanna. A fun start to the day.
Glad you were entertained, Liz. But you do start early, don’t you?
I had a 7am Tesco delivery!
That explains everything! I had one of those on Friday. Didn’t recover for the rest of the day 😉
I really enjoyed that.
😉 And welcome to Libertà, Raven. Nice to see you here.
Thank you, glad to be here
Well, apart from the rather heady prose, I have to say I didn’t pick up a lot of anachronisms. My excuse is a ghastly headache while I was reading it! I look forward to your list. I ought to have picked up more of them, I’m sure, and will no doubt go “Oh, yes” when I read your list.
I don’t know much about plants, so much of that may have passed me by, but certainly would not include anything that I hadn’t checked existed at the time.
I have to say my strongest reaction was, could we please cut to the chase? And the interior of the house was somewhat inconsistent with the apparent delapidation of exterior. But I plead my brain was not at its brightest at the time…
Must say I grinned at your “cut to the chase”, Liz. Agree on inconsistency between exterior and interior. But you didn’t expect consistency in drivel, did you? 😉
Loved it! Picked up a fair few of the most obvious, but will look forward to the newsletter, which I signed up for in case I hadn’t previously… Sadly, it reminded me of a couple of Regencies I read 20 years ago which made me determined never to read one by an American author again. Saving one or two, of course.
I think that the author of the Bothwell quote might possibly have been an American, Lesley.
And don’t forget the geographical and time inconsistencies. Send me demented. Naming no names, but in this day and age you can check… even if you don’t have a physical atlas. Sorry… gone off at a tangent.
No, Raven. As a reader, you are perfectly entitled to pick holes in what authors write. It’s supposed to be our job to get it right. Not that we always do. It’s those pesky unknown unknowns…
There seem to be a few botanical problems?
Susie
Possibly, Susie. Or possibly not. I couldn’t possibly say, until the newsletter surfaces in a day or two.
I sincerely hope that Jolyon shot his grouse on horseback at his estate in the banks of the Thames as a character did in a truly wonderfully ghastly Regency I read once.
Well, Louise, Jolyon is probably capable of anything, even grouse on the banks of the Thames. He is definitely not hero material. And, as the author, I am glad I don’t have to write any more of him.
Absolutely spiffing, Joanna. Chuckling and in no robotic manner.
No answer to that, Sandra. Jolly hockey sticks to you, too.